Wednesday, June 18, 2008

What our "elect" think about your rights

Here is a side by side comparison of some famous leaders, and some of our leaders today.

They believe that your rights should be restricted, and theirs boundless. It isn't OK for you to carry your firearm, but in many states only "special" permits are allowed. (And by special, this means powerful, or rich. Or elected official.) Those "rich and famous" idiots that want you not to be able to carry your guns to protect yourself ... pay body guards to carry one to protect them.

I know this seems a little hypocritical... but if you were "smart" or knew what they did ... this would all make perfect sense.

1.
Adolf Hitler: "This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead." (Chancellor's Speech, 1935)

Charles (Chuck) Shumer: (US Congress, has sworn an oath to defend the US Constitution) "All we ask for is registration, just like we do for cars." (Press conference, 1993, exact date being sought)

2.
Adolf Hitler: "The most foolish mistake we could make would be to allow the subject peoples to possess arms. So let's not have any talk about native militias." (Hitler's Secret Conversations, 1941-44, Farrar, Strauss and Young, 1953)

Mao Tse Tung: "All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party." (Problems of War and Strategy, Nov 6 1938, published in "Selected Works of Mao Zedong," 1965)

Diane Feinstein: "US Senator, If I could have banned them all- 'Mr. and Mrs. America turn in your guns' -I would have!" (Statement on TV program 69 Minutes, Feb 5 1995)

3.
Mahatma Gandhi: "Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest." ("Gandhi, an Autobiography," M.K. Gandhi, 446)

Sigmund Freud: "A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." ("General Introduction to Psychoanalysis," S. Freud)

Bill Clinton: (US President, has sworn an oath to defend the US Constitution, (not to violate it, criticize it, and belittle it) "When we got organized as a country, [and] wrote a fairly radical Constitution, with a radical Bill of Rights, giving radical amounts of freedom to Americans, it was assumed that Americans who had that freedom would use it responsibly...When personal freedom is being abused, you have to move to limit it." (April 19 1994, on MTV)



Now Lets Look At What Our Founding Fathers Thought About The Subject ... These Might Be Names You Know. They Were Brilliant, Unlike Our "Educated" Elect Today.

Benjamin Franklin: Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Nov 11 1755, from the Pennsylvania Assembly's reply to the Governor of Pennsylvania.)

Thomas Jefferson: "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined or determined to commit crimes. Such laws only make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assassins; they serve to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." (1764 Letter and speech from T. Jefferson quoting with approval an essay by Cesare Beccari)

George Mason: "To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them." (3 Elliot, Debates at 380)

Thomas Jefferson: "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." (T. Jefferson papers, 334, C.J. Boyd, Ed. 1950)

George Washington: "A free people ought to be armed." (Jan 14 1790, Boston Independent Chronicle.)

Noah Webster: "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe." (1787, Pamphlets on the Constitution of the US)

John Adams: "Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at individual discretion in private self defense." (A defense of the Constitution of the US)

George Washington: "Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the people's liberty teeth (and) keystone... the rifle and the pistol are equally indispensable... more than 99% of them [guns] by their silence indicate that they are in safe and sane hands. The very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference [crime]. When firearms go, all goes, we need them every hour." (Address to 1st session of Congress)

James Madison: "Americans have the right and advantage of being armed, unlike the people of other countries, whose people are afraid to trust them with arms." (Federalist Paper #46)

George Mason: "I ask you sir, who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people." (Elliott, Debates, 425-426)

Alexander Hamilton: "...that standing army can never be formidable (threatening) to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in the use of arms." (Federalist Paper #29)

Patrick Henry: "The people have a right to keep and bear arms." (Elliott, Debates at 185)

James Madison: "A WELL REGULATED militia, composed of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country." (1st Annals of Congress, at 434, June 8th 1789)

Richard Henry Lee: "A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves...and include all men capable of bearing arms." (Additional letters from the Federal Farmer, at 169, 1788)

Now lets move to a more current & pressing situation.
Since I believe you can't believe anything a politician says during a campaign, you have to look to what they have said in the past to truly get what they believe.

2003 Independent Voters of Illinois – Independent Precinct Organization Questionnaire. Barrack Husein Obama answered the following (no wait... my uh.. staffer... yeah my staffer filled that out... yeah that's the ticket)

"35. Do you support legislation to ban the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns?

While a complete ban on handguns is not politically practicable, I believe reasonable restrictions on the sale and possession of handguns are necessary to protect the public safety. In the Illinois Senate last year, I supported a package of bills to limit individual Illinoisans to purchasing one handgun a month; require all promoters and sellers at firearms shows to carry a state license; allow civil liability for death or injuries caused by handguns; and require FOID applicants to apply in person. I would support similar efforts at the federal level, including retaining the Brady Law.

Boy, it sure is a good thing CRIMINALS don't get their guns from anywhere other than a LEGAL "promoter and seller". And it is a good thing they go in and have a background check ran. And it is a good thing that they only get one a month too. OTHERWISE I would be afraid. I don't know where Barrack Husein Obama went to school but he needs to see if he can get a refund. They didn't learn him too good !! If a midwestern redneck gets it, why can't he?

Then the questionnaire continues on the same question but with a points b, and c...

b. assault weapons?

Yes.

c. ammunition for handguns and assault weapons?

I would support banning the sale of ammunition for assault weapons and limiting the sale of ammunition for handguns.

You know... limiting bullets is a round about way of taking away guns. Well we won't take away your gun ... but you can't have any bullets. So your gun is useless anyway. And in turn it takes away the power that was guaranteed by the constitution... just without "taking" the gun. Because they know they can't. But then again, the fact that they can't take them away is why they are scared of them in the first place.

In his book - The Audacity of Hope, p.215 Oct 1, 2006
"I believe in keeping guns out of our inner cities, and that our leaders must say so in the face of the gun manufacturer's lobby. "

Did he ever stop and think? I doubt it. But what he fails to see is that he wants to put a law into place that would only hurt the people that go by the law. Not the criminal. This is administering a wrong treatment for the wrong disease.

No one goes into the doctor with cancer and the doctor says... here is a bottle of baby aspirin... HOPE it helps... Are you kidding !!

Chicago Defender, Dec. 13, 1999

"Obama is proposing to make it a felony for a gun owner whose firearm was stolen from his residence which causes harm to another person if that weapon was not securely stored in that home. (Define "securely")

He's proposing restricting gun purchases to one weapon a month and banning the sale of firearms at gun shows except for "antique" weapons. Obama is also proposing increasing the licensing fee to obtain a federal firearms license. (No way... R RAISE Taxes. Say it ain't so Mr. Obama) ....

He's proposing that all federally licensed gun dealers sell firearms in a storefront and not from their homes while banning their business from being within five miles of a school or a park. He's also banning the sale of 'junk' handguns like the popular Saturday Night Specials." (So I think we established the FACT that Criminals don't get their guns from a dealer, so why mess with the dealers? Why make it difficult to impossible to have a gun store? Simple it is the same reason they want to make it hard to buy bullets. To be able to skirt the 2nd amendment.)

1996 Independent Voters of Illinois – Independent Precinct Organization Questionnaire.

Do you support state legislation ???
a. ban the manufacture, sale or possession of handguns?
Yes.
b. ban the manufacture, sale or possession of assault weapons?
Yes.
c. mandatory waiting periods with background checks for weapons?
Yes.

Now my apologies about sounding like a parrot... But AGAIN... CRIMINALS DON'T BUY THE GUNS THEY USE, IN A STORE OR FROM A DEALER. THEY STEAL THEM OR BUY THEM FROM SOMEONE THAT DID STEAL THEM, OR SELLS THEM ILLEGALLY. BUT THEY ARE NOT WAITING FOR A BACKGROUND CHECK AND THEY DON'T GET CONCEALED CARRY PERMITS EITHER.


WHEN will the "brilliant" leaders who are "educated" stop doing the same thing over and over and over and over and think that "this time" it will work. Isn't that INSANE? But the reason they do is to blame others for their mistakes in the hopes that people will vote for them.

In the senate... Obama has voted as follows.

Newest first (closest to the "runnin for the president")
2006 SA4615
Prohibition On Confiscation Of Firearms (this keeps Homeland security from using their funds to come and take your guns)
Vote for gun owners.

2005 S.397
Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (This stops any current and prevents any future lawsuits against the gun manuf.)
Vote against gun manufacturers twice.

SA1615 Cop Killer Bullet Ban (hi-vel. rounds or "armor piercing" which are both handgun and rifle rounds)
Vote against gun owners.

SA1620 S.397Exemption for Children (which skirts the law that lets the manuf. to be held blameless for the actions of CRIMINALS that use their guns. This is like you choosing to eat a greasy cheeseburger from "cheeseburger world" every meal for 10 years and then blaming them because YOU have hi cholesterol. OR putting a lawsuit against GM because someone you love was killed in a wreck where the other person was driving a Chevy. Doesn't really make sense does it?)
Vote against gun manufacturers.

SA1623 Gross Negligence Amendment (This one is a gem. This would gut the one previous. And would leave it open for the COURT to decide "gross neg". And the "court" is doing a bang up job letting people who are not citizens and enemy combatants, legal rights under the US Constitution.)
Vote against gun manufacturers.

SA1626 Child Safety Lock Act of 2005 (This makes it a requirement to purchase a gun lock when you buy a gun. If you have the gun for home defense this makes PERFECT sense... I mean who doesn't want to fumble around in the dark to get the lock off your gun when there is someone in your child's room in the middle of the night? That is if you have the key right there, and not on the other side of the house or in the garage.)
Vote against gun owners.

SA1644 Update to SA1620 (This one is really a non issue. And is a perfect example of repeated, repetitive redundancy. And a good use of taxpayer money. But that assumes that they don't have anything better to be doing.)
Vote against gun manufacturers.


SA1645 Update to SA1615 (Asinine amendment, just ups spent money that belongs to the taxpayer of course. Also Ol' Kennedy gets to write in it that they should have passed his bill earlier. What a wast of time. And on top of that ... Obama votes "no comment" or present. Why even waste your time voting if you aren't going to ACTUALLY vote?)
Neutral vote.

We can conclude the following from his votes...
Obama says he is for the 2nd amendment ... but doesn't really. He just says so to court the voter that is "clinging to their guns and religion."

Some thing else ... How can you say that you are for CHANGE and then be in alignment with people like Ted Kennedy and other people that are the Antithisis of CHANGE?





No comments: