Is being Gay natural.....

Below is an article from Newsmax, about Michael Reagan’s response to the Rogue Supreme Court in California, that ignores the voting public and chooses to legislate law from the bench. (If you have ever taken a class in government, you know what they did this week, is ILLEGAL. But no one will have the balls to stand up to them and remove them or put them behind bars.)

Reacting to the decision of the California Supreme Court to ignore Proposition 22, which declares that “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California," and was passed with a whopping 61 percent of the vote, an outraged Michael Reagan urged California voters to join him in refusing to vote for any ballot measures in the State of California in the 2008 November election since the courts can simply nullify their votes whenever they want to.
Reagan, whose father Ronald Reagan served two terms as California’s governor before winning the presidency in 1980, said "I am taking my ballot and mailing it directly to the Supreme Court of California at 350 McAllister Street San Francisco, CA 94102-4797 to allow the judges to decide for us. They’re going to do it anyway.”
Reagan told Newsmax: "We have seen this time and time again, Democracy usurped, the voters wishes do not matter, whether its Proposition 187 or the Gay Marriage Ban, its no longer 'We the People,' it is now, 'They the Judges' who make the decisions in the Golden State. As the son of a former Governor of this state I am disgusted."
Noting that the courts have been thwarting the express will of the people, Reagan explained to NewsMax in an exclusive interview that “Proposition 187, a 1994 ballot initiative designed to deny social services, health care, and public education to illegal aliens that passed with 58.8 percent of the vote was overturned by a federal court, in effect telling the voters their will doesn’t count.
“The state of California has a history of voting for ballot measures. But any time Californians seem to vote for an issue that may be even slightly conservative, the liberal left goes out and shops judges, or as in this case, shops courts, and gets them to overturn ballot measures overwhelmingly supported by the voters,” Reagan said.
California voters have no remedy for judicial interference with their expressed will. Reagan said, “We don’t have a Republican Party, it does not exist, it does nothing, and we have a nincompoop for a governor who wants to raise sale taxes or borrow money from the lottery to pay down the out-of-control debt caused by the liberals who are running this state. I’m about ready to say bring back Grey Davis, the guy we recalled.
Schwarzenegger has vetoed two measures that would have authorized same-sex marriage, and today said he would abide by the court's ruling.
"I respect the court's decision and as governor, I will uphold its ruling," he said in a statement. "Also, as I have said in the past, I will not support an amendment to the constitution that would overturn this state Supreme Court ruling."
Said Mike Reagan “The only recourse California voters have is to protest by following my example and mailing their ballots dealing with the proposed propositions to the State Supreme Court. Let them mark it since it does the voters no good to vote in California when we have a Supreme Court that overturns their will whenever they feel like it."
“Why should I vote?” Reagan asked. “I have no reason to vote so as of now I’m stopping. It doesn’t matter what the voters think. It only matters what liberals in black robes think.”
© 2008 Newsmax. All rights reserved. By: Phil Brennan Friday, May 16, 2008

The more and more I see this crap, the more irritated I become. I have had it with people that can’t get their point of view passed by the legal way; so they must get it passed by the courts the illegal way. The Homosexual agenda and the Nazi-esqe tactics they employ is pretty pathetic. They are people just like you and I but that is not good enough for them.

They want “special” treatment, and laws that protect their perverse lifestyles. The most common argument for gay marriage is they want “equal protection” under the law. You have to be as sharp as a bowling ball to believe that. (I guess the California Supreme court must staff themselves with people right off the short bus.) This has nothing to do with equal protection. And apparently those who believe it is must do some pretty good political and legal jujitsu to come to that conclusion.

Here is why. I being a male, cannot marry another male. A gay man being a male, cannot marry another male. My sister, being a female, cannot marry a female. A gay woman being a woman, cannot marry another female. Where is this law discriminatory I ask? Simple, it doesn’t provide what they want.

The only difference in me marrying a male, and a gay man marrying a male; is that I don’t want to. Plain, and Simple. It is just that Simple, No more No less.

There is no other factors. It isn’t that I hate gays, or they scare me. Not at all. In fact I love them just like I love everyone else. This doesn’t mean they get to break the law just because they want to. If the world ran like that there would be complete and total anarchy.

I know many gays and have many gays as friends. And what I see most often… is that being gay is what their ENTIRE life becomes about. Nothing they do can just BE DONE. It has to somehow identify them as being Gay, or it has to Justify their being gay, or something along those lines. Their entire world becomes consumed with “gay”-ness. Which to me is odd; because my life isn’t about my being heterosexual at every second of the day. My daily life is not consumed with my sexuality, and everything that, that entails. I don’t look at everything in life through the “straight” lens; in fact I really don’t even think about it. It is there to enhance my life not to consume every minute of it to justify why I am the way I am.

All that being said; It does bring up the topic of nature and what is natural and un-natural. If something is natural, you don’t need to justify it. It would not need to be defended at every step, and at every second of every minute of every hour of every day. This in and of itself, should be proof of what is really “natural” and what is not “natural”.

If you were indeed “born that way” why would you need to justify it…if it in fact is natural?

If we are to believe evolution is correct, and we are to believe that homosexuality is correct, and we are to believe that “survival of the fittest” is correct. Would there not be a way to procreate through a same sex union? Why the need for both sexes if it is indeed natural?

The truth of the matter is that it isn’t normal, it isn’t natural. In fact it is against the very order of nature. That is why there is a need to constantly, and militantly defend this lifestyle.