In the week following the aftermath of spitting, shredding and pissing on the constitution, there have been a lot of interesting turns of events. There have been convenient and simultaneous, and strangely similar “racial” comments shouted at black legislators that no one can seem to come up with any real evidence for, other than some politicians “word”. The same politicians that lie to us all the time, and tell us half truths. But here they are as pure as the wind driven snow... Right?
There have been the fake outrage by the republicans, and fingers being pointed on both sides of the isle, and everyone blaming every one else for the outrage of the American people. There has been the term “racist” levied at people that oppose the Soetoro administration; because of course if you are against Barry’s agenda you have to be racist, NOT of course because you believe what he is pushing through is wrong or UN-constitutional. It is obvious that you are racist and you hate all people of color. Doesn’t that make sense to you?
Even though many people are outraged about the government over reaching of their power one thing is certain, we must not turn to violent attempts to have our voices heard. That time may come in the future but it is not here yet.
Jay Sekulow, chief counsel of the ACLJ, said this about the unconstitutional law …
"The individual mandate-forcing Americans to purchase health insurance under penalty of law-violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, most Americans do not want this plan. That includes millions of pro-life Americans who don't want to be forced to purchase a health care package that funds abortion. This health care law should not be forced upon the American people. We believe the courts will agree."
Fourteen states have filed suit against the federal government over the HUGE usurpation of the people’s rights. Has your state?
If not find out who your attorney general is, find out who your senators and congressmen are, and find out who your Governor is, and contact them all and urge them to file a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of this abortion paid, and soon the euthanasia of YOUR grandmother. Once they set up the panels and bureaucratic red tape committee’s that will determine if YOUR grandma is worth saving, and how much she can contribute back to society in return for the money they spend on her treatment.
But not only is this law unconstitutional, it is only for the unwashed masses, NOT for Congress the Senate or the President. It is good enough to keep you in line but not good enough to entrust the first families health to.
Politico reports this… “page 158 of the bill defines “congressional staff” narrowly, as “employees employed by the official office of a member of congress, whether in the district office or in Washington. “The Congressional Research Service believes a court could rule that the legislation would exclude professional committee staff, joint committee staff, some shared staff, as well as potentially those staff employed by leadership offices.
If that’s so, staffers who work for Nancy Pelosi in her capacity as representative from California would go into the exchange program, while staffers who work for her in her capacity as speaker would stay on the government’s plan. Other Capitol employees, like those who work for the Clerk of the House or the House Historian, would be similarly exempted.”
Republican Senator Coburn said … “The American people will be appalled to learn the health care bill exempts leadership and committee staff. This special deal for unelected staff underscores everything the public detests about the arrogance of power in Washington, I tried to fix this inequity along with senators Grassley, Burr and Vitter, but Majority Leader [Harry] Reid obstructed our effort. And, President Obama himself will not live under Obama health care. The message to grassroots America is that it’s good enough for you, but not for us. Meanwhile, we await Mr. Obama’s explanation why if his historic health care law is so great for America, it’s not good enough for him and his family.”
Again the Republicans and the Democrats are all in on this. They started with the TARP, then to the Bank Bailouts, and it is now to Healthcare, and next you will see them push amnesty again, and then to Cap and Tax, and other Facist ideas... MARK MY WORDS.
It is time for the sleeping giant to wake up and stop swallowing the mind numbing medicine that is their propaganda. Start growing your own food and stop eating Genetically Modified Food, Push to remove Flouride from your water. Which by the way was a trick the Russians learned from their German scientists that defected to the USSR after WWII to give to people to make them docile and non violent.
Friday, March 26, 2010
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
The Spirit Of Hitler Lives On In The Modern Democratic Party
I am stupefied by the Modern Dem's and their insane antics. Telling lie after foolish lie. Pretending to be "for the people" and spitting on them and removing their self-worth and self-esteem and self-reliance by making them dependant on the Government to survive.
Now we have a new and all time low in the "speaker" Nancy Pelosi. Even though she is as sharp as a bowling ball, she is the "leader" of the dumb-o-crats in congress. And of course is towing the line and trying to pass the new "stimulus" plan which is nothing more than a spending bill that gives pork spending to EVERY dumb-o-crat special interest group there is. With that being said I think the statements she made the other day about contraceptives being "good" for the economy. Which in an almost too simple fashion what she said is right. Less people = not as much use of items/ products which will lessen demand on them and cause the prices to go down & in a round about way help our dollar to recover, & in turn help our economy "recover".
However most people don't look past the utter stupidity of the statement and see the rationale behind it. Eugenics. All the ideas of eugenics ... infanticide, euthanasia, creating a "better" human race, are INSANE.
Although "speaker" (who really should not, ever again) Pelosi is only the most recent political figure to show her true colors on this subject, she is not the first. This idea is as old as the devil himself. It is a horrible way to destroy life for the sake of the living. And murder in the name of CONVENIENCE.
Eugenics was an international scientific, political and moral IDEOLOGY and movement which was at its height in first half of the twentieth century, but was dealt a huge blow with the defeat of HITLER in WWII. However it did not go away. brutal movement which inflicted massive human rights violations on millions of people. The movement, led by race scientists, financed by private philanthropies such as the Carnegie Institute and the ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION and implemented by governmental parties in many nations. Hitler is probably the one person that comes to the minds of most people when this now "defunct" movement is mention. It was first introduced to us in the late 1800's from the cousin of good ol' darwin I don't remember off the top of my head what his first name was but his last name was Galton I think. Some other names like Theodore Roosevelt, HG Wells, William Kellogg (yep Kellogg's cereal, think about that when you eat your Wheaties) and Margaret Sanger (The founder of PLANNED PARENTHOOD). This movement lead to legislation, that forced sterilization of "defectives".
Hitler thought the blond hair and blue eyes of the Arian were the perfect race. (Never mind the fact that they are actually recessive genes.) Sanger on the other hand believed that "people of color" were less than those that were of the better more evolved "white" race. Which we all know is absolute insanity. However that would explain why she opened the first Planned Parenthood in Brooklyn. Now take note of the location of the planned parenthood in your area. Is it in "upper class white" neighborhood? Or in a poor primarily "ethnic" neighborhood? Now I am sure not ALL of these abortion mills are in ethnic neighborhoods.
Now ask your self these questions, and be truly honest with yourself. Which political party supports always increasing funds for Planned Parenthood? Which party asks you to get on welfare and always come to them daily for a fish? Which one of the parties asks you to be self-sufficient? Which one doesn't want you to be dependant on the government?
Now, back to the "speaker" Pelosi. Following the party platform is pushing an agenda of Eugenics. Now I am sure she believes this stuff, and has the best intentions. I mean in a super twisted way... Hitler had the best intentions too, for the Mother race and Father Germany.
Think about it.
Now we have a new and all time low in the "speaker" Nancy Pelosi. Even though she is as sharp as a bowling ball, she is the "leader" of the dumb-o-crats in congress. And of course is towing the line and trying to pass the new "stimulus" plan which is nothing more than a spending bill that gives pork spending to EVERY dumb-o-crat special interest group there is. With that being said I think the statements she made the other day about contraceptives being "good" for the economy. Which in an almost too simple fashion what she said is right. Less people = not as much use of items/ products which will lessen demand on them and cause the prices to go down & in a round about way help our dollar to recover, & in turn help our economy "recover".
However most people don't look past the utter stupidity of the statement and see the rationale behind it. Eugenics. All the ideas of eugenics ... infanticide, euthanasia, creating a "better" human race, are INSANE.
Although "speaker" (who really should not, ever again) Pelosi is only the most recent political figure to show her true colors on this subject, she is not the first. This idea is as old as the devil himself. It is a horrible way to destroy life for the sake of the living. And murder in the name of CONVENIENCE.
Eugenics was an international scientific, political and moral IDEOLOGY and movement which was at its height in first half of the twentieth century, but was dealt a huge blow with the defeat of HITLER in WWII. However it did not go away. brutal movement which inflicted massive human rights violations on millions of people. The movement, led by race scientists, financed by private philanthropies such as the Carnegie Institute and the ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION and implemented by governmental parties in many nations. Hitler is probably the one person that comes to the minds of most people when this now "defunct" movement is mention. It was first introduced to us in the late 1800's from the cousin of good ol' darwin I don't remember off the top of my head what his first name was but his last name was Galton I think. Some other names like Theodore Roosevelt, HG Wells, William Kellogg (yep Kellogg's cereal, think about that when you eat your Wheaties) and Margaret Sanger (The founder of PLANNED PARENTHOOD). This movement lead to legislation, that forced sterilization of "defectives".
Hitler thought the blond hair and blue eyes of the Arian were the perfect race. (Never mind the fact that they are actually recessive genes.) Sanger on the other hand believed that "people of color" were less than those that were of the better more evolved "white" race. Which we all know is absolute insanity. However that would explain why she opened the first Planned Parenthood in Brooklyn. Now take note of the location of the planned parenthood in your area. Is it in "upper class white" neighborhood? Or in a poor primarily "ethnic" neighborhood? Now I am sure not ALL of these abortion mills are in ethnic neighborhoods.
Now ask your self these questions, and be truly honest with yourself. Which political party supports always increasing funds for Planned Parenthood? Which party asks you to get on welfare and always come to them daily for a fish? Which one of the parties asks you to be self-sufficient? Which one doesn't want you to be dependant on the government?
Now, back to the "speaker" Pelosi. Following the party platform is pushing an agenda of Eugenics. Now I am sure she believes this stuff, and has the best intentions. I mean in a super twisted way... Hitler had the best intentions too, for the Mother race and Father Germany.
Think about it.
Friday, January 23, 2009
Gun control... a good thing? HITLER says yes. So does OBAMA, HOLDER, EMANUEL AND THE LIKE!
Here is something I will almost bet you DON'T KNOW.
A quote from the evil man of the Nazi regime.
"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country." --Adolf Hitler, dinner talk on April 11, 1942, quoted in Hitler's Table Talk 1941-44: His Private Conversations, Second Edition (1973), Pg. 425-426. Translated by Norman Cameron and R. H. Stevens. Introduced and with a new preface by H. R. Trevor-Roper. The original German papers were known as Bormann-Vermerke.
Now to the actual law... The "Nazi Weapons Act of 1938" did several things...
1. It classified guns into categories and said guns were for "sporting purposes".
2. All citizens who wished to purchase firearms had to register with the Nazi officials and have a background check.
3. Presumed German citizens were hostile and thereby exempted Nazis from the gun control law.
4. Gave Nazis unrestricted power to decide what kinds of firearms could, or could not be owned by private persons.
5. The types of ammunition that were legal were subject to control by bureaucrats.
6. Juveniles under 18 years could not buy firearms and ammunition.
A Gun Control Law Passed by the German Government One Day After Kristallnacht
Regulations Against Jews' Possession of Weapons
11 November 1938
With a basis in §31 of the Weapons Law of 18 March 1938 (Reichsgesetzblatt I, p.265), Article III of the Law on the Reunification of Austria with Germany of 13 March 1938 (Reichsgesetzblatt I, p. 237), and §9 of the Führer and Chancellor's decree on the administration of the Sudeten-German districts of 1 October 1938 (Reichsgesetzblatt I, p 1331) are the following ordered:
§1 Jews (§5 of the First Regulations of the German Citizenship Law of 14 November 1935, Reichsgesetzblatt I, p. 1333) are prohibited from acquiring, possessing, and carrying firearms and ammunition, as well as truncheons or stabbing weapons. Those now possessing weapons and ammunition are at once to turn them over to the local police authority.
§2 Firearms and ammunition found in a Jew's possession will be forfeited to the government without compensation.
§3 The Minister of the Interior may make exceptions to the Prohibition in §1 for Jews who are foreign nationals. He can entrust other authorities with this power.
§4 Whoever willfully or negligently violates the provisions of §1 will be punished with imprisonment and a fine. In especially severe cases of deliberate violations, the punishment is imprisonment in a penitentiary for up to five years.
§5 For the implementation of this regulation, the Minister of the Interior waives the necessary legal and administrative provisions.
§6 This regulation is valid in the state of Austria and in the Sudeten-German districts.
Berlin, 11 November 1938
Minister of the Interior
Frick
Now if you are honest with yourself and look at this disgusting piece of Nazi trash law. You will see that the Brady Campaign is in full agreement, California is in full agreement, Chicago, NYC, Washington DC, are all in full agreement. Not to mention attorney general nominee Eric H. Holder Jr, Rahm Emanuel, & even Obama his self. (If you don't believe Obama hates the 2nd amendment, look at where his vote has been cast in the past. Not the drivel that spews from his mouth.)
Now you are probably asking the same question I was when I learned this dirty little secret...Where does that leave you and I?
ENSLAVED, BY THE GOVERNMENT FOR THE SAKE OF THEIR POWER AND CONTROL OF THE PEOPLE. Which is why the USA became a nation to start with.
A quote from the evil man of the Nazi regime.
"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country." --Adolf Hitler, dinner talk on April 11, 1942, quoted in Hitler's Table Talk 1941-44: His Private Conversations, Second Edition (1973), Pg. 425-426. Translated by Norman Cameron and R. H. Stevens. Introduced and with a new preface by H. R. Trevor-Roper. The original German papers were known as Bormann-Vermerke.
Now to the actual law... The "Nazi Weapons Act of 1938" did several things...
1. It classified guns into categories and said guns were for "sporting purposes".
2. All citizens who wished to purchase firearms had to register with the Nazi officials and have a background check.
3. Presumed German citizens were hostile and thereby exempted Nazis from the gun control law.
4. Gave Nazis unrestricted power to decide what kinds of firearms could, or could not be owned by private persons.
5. The types of ammunition that were legal were subject to control by bureaucrats.
6. Juveniles under 18 years could not buy firearms and ammunition.
A Gun Control Law Passed by the German Government One Day After Kristallnacht
Regulations Against Jews' Possession of Weapons
11 November 1938
With a basis in §31 of the Weapons Law of 18 March 1938 (Reichsgesetzblatt I, p.265), Article III of the Law on the Reunification of Austria with Germany of 13 March 1938 (Reichsgesetzblatt I, p. 237), and §9 of the Führer and Chancellor's decree on the administration of the Sudeten-German districts of 1 October 1938 (Reichsgesetzblatt I, p 1331) are the following ordered:
§1 Jews (§5 of the First Regulations of the German Citizenship Law of 14 November 1935, Reichsgesetzblatt I, p. 1333) are prohibited from acquiring, possessing, and carrying firearms and ammunition, as well as truncheons or stabbing weapons. Those now possessing weapons and ammunition are at once to turn them over to the local police authority.
§2 Firearms and ammunition found in a Jew's possession will be forfeited to the government without compensation.
§3 The Minister of the Interior may make exceptions to the Prohibition in §1 for Jews who are foreign nationals. He can entrust other authorities with this power.
§4 Whoever willfully or negligently violates the provisions of §1 will be punished with imprisonment and a fine. In especially severe cases of deliberate violations, the punishment is imprisonment in a penitentiary for up to five years.
§5 For the implementation of this regulation, the Minister of the Interior waives the necessary legal and administrative provisions.
§6 This regulation is valid in the state of Austria and in the Sudeten-German districts.
Berlin, 11 November 1938
Minister of the Interior
Frick
Now if you are honest with yourself and look at this disgusting piece of Nazi trash law. You will see that the Brady Campaign is in full agreement, California is in full agreement, Chicago, NYC, Washington DC, are all in full agreement. Not to mention attorney general nominee Eric H. Holder Jr, Rahm Emanuel, & even Obama his self. (If you don't believe Obama hates the 2nd amendment, look at where his vote has been cast in the past. Not the drivel that spews from his mouth.)
Now you are probably asking the same question I was when I learned this dirty little secret...Where does that leave you and I?
ENSLAVED, BY THE GOVERNMENT FOR THE SAKE OF THEIR POWER AND CONTROL OF THE PEOPLE. Which is why the USA became a nation to start with.
Congress is not listening...
I have written on several occasions to our "senator" Claire McCaskill. This in and of it self does not seem to be out of the ordinary. But what I received in return is what is the amusing part of the whole situation.
I wrote to both senators and my representative. All of them except the brilliant McCaskill have not written back as of yet.
So let me frame the situation so you will understand what happened.
When you "contact" the almighty senators or representatives, you have to put in all of your information, and you have to select the "topic" from a drop down menu. So since I was writing about the new unconstitutional BS proposal from Blair Holt. You know the Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 (H.R. 45). I asked her to review and vote against this pathetic attempt to ENSLAVE, yep I said enslave, the people of the USA.
Basically along with a dozen or so other completely unconstitutional parts of the wanna be law, HR 45 requires the Attorney General to establish and maintain a database of information that includes the name, address, and firearm license number of any individual receiving a firearm. In addition, this database must include the manufacturer, model, serial number, and date of receipt of the firearms received by each individual. As it is so clearly described above, this information is not necessary to trace firearms used in crimes. It is only necessary to create "people of interest lists" of the people who own/sell or buy certain numbers or types of firearms and ammo.
So now you know what the message I sent to the "senator" said. Now see her response.
"Dear XXXXXXXXXXXX:
Thank you for contacting me regarding the “DC Gun Ban.” I appreciate hearing from you, and I welcome the chance to respond.As you may know, in 1976, the Washington D.C. City Council passed laws banning handguns and restricting the possession of rifles and shotguns.
Last November, the U.S. Supreme Court announced that it would take up the case of District of Columbia v. Heller, which will determine if DC’s gun laws violate the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This is the first time since 1939 that the Supreme Court will rule on Second Amendment rights.
I am encouraged that our nation’s highest court will review this case – this is the correct forum to determine such important matters of Constitutional law.
As your United States Senator, I will work to ensure that any efforts in Congress to promote appropriate gun safety measures do not unduly infringe upon law-abiding citizens’ right to own firearms or burden the hunting and sportsmanship culture of Missouri.
Again, I appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts with me. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future regarding other matters of interest or concern to you.
All best,
Senator Claire McCaskill"
Now let me break this down for you. Most people think that this is not a big deal because they won't do anything wrong with the guns they buy so why should it matter? Right? Well that is nice and all, but just is not true.
This database can only have one use. GUN CONFISCATION. Knowing who bought the gun to start with, NO MORE PRIVATE SALES FACE TO FACE. When they can track each one, and put in jail those that lost one or had one stolen and didn't report it within 48 hours to the Attorney General. Also if they can get their "micro-stamping" passed it will be illegal to own "untraceable" or unmarked ammo. Now they can take away your rights and you will not be able to do a thing about it.
LET ME MAKE MYSELF CLEAR. You ONLY have your other rights because the people as a whole in the USA are armed. The FBI estimates that there are OVER 200,000,000 firearms in PRIVATE ownership in the USA. Do you think the gov. can roll over the people when they have that many firearms? It is quite sad that most people don't know enough about history to know how the USA came INTO existance. By the end of the gun, and death, and blood sweat and many, many tears.
Time and time again throughout history, the people have first been disarmed, then enslaved and killed.
That is all for this one. I will expand further in coming letters. Thank you for reading.
I wrote to both senators and my representative. All of them except the brilliant McCaskill have not written back as of yet.
So let me frame the situation so you will understand what happened.
When you "contact" the almighty senators or representatives, you have to put in all of your information, and you have to select the "topic" from a drop down menu. So since I was writing about the new unconstitutional BS proposal from Blair Holt. You know the Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 (H.R. 45). I asked her to review and vote against this pathetic attempt to ENSLAVE, yep I said enslave, the people of the USA.
Basically along with a dozen or so other completely unconstitutional parts of the wanna be law, HR 45 requires the Attorney General to establish and maintain a database of information that includes the name, address, and firearm license number of any individual receiving a firearm. In addition, this database must include the manufacturer, model, serial number, and date of receipt of the firearms received by each individual. As it is so clearly described above, this information is not necessary to trace firearms used in crimes. It is only necessary to create "people of interest lists" of the people who own/sell or buy certain numbers or types of firearms and ammo.
So now you know what the message I sent to the "senator" said. Now see her response.
"Dear XXXXXXXXXXXX:
Thank you for contacting me regarding the “DC Gun Ban.” I appreciate hearing from you, and I welcome the chance to respond.As you may know, in 1976, the Washington D.C. City Council passed laws banning handguns and restricting the possession of rifles and shotguns.
Last November, the U.S. Supreme Court announced that it would take up the case of District of Columbia v. Heller, which will determine if DC’s gun laws violate the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This is the first time since 1939 that the Supreme Court will rule on Second Amendment rights.
I am encouraged that our nation’s highest court will review this case – this is the correct forum to determine such important matters of Constitutional law.
As your United States Senator, I will work to ensure that any efforts in Congress to promote appropriate gun safety measures do not unduly infringe upon law-abiding citizens’ right to own firearms or burden the hunting and sportsmanship culture of Missouri.
Again, I appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts with me. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future regarding other matters of interest or concern to you.
All best,
Senator Claire McCaskill"
Now let me break this down for you. Most people think that this is not a big deal because they won't do anything wrong with the guns they buy so why should it matter? Right? Well that is nice and all, but just is not true.
This database can only have one use. GUN CONFISCATION. Knowing who bought the gun to start with, NO MORE PRIVATE SALES FACE TO FACE. When they can track each one, and put in jail those that lost one or had one stolen and didn't report it within 48 hours to the Attorney General. Also if they can get their "micro-stamping" passed it will be illegal to own "untraceable" or unmarked ammo. Now they can take away your rights and you will not be able to do a thing about it.
LET ME MAKE MYSELF CLEAR. You ONLY have your other rights because the people as a whole in the USA are armed. The FBI estimates that there are OVER 200,000,000 firearms in PRIVATE ownership in the USA. Do you think the gov. can roll over the people when they have that many firearms? It is quite sad that most people don't know enough about history to know how the USA came INTO existance. By the end of the gun, and death, and blood sweat and many, many tears.
Time and time again throughout history, the people have first been disarmed, then enslaved and killed.
That is all for this one. I will expand further in coming letters. Thank you for reading.
Monday, January 12, 2009
Another Brady Camp Lie...
Well the folks at the Brady camp are at it all the time aren't they? Now this isn't a lie in and of itself, because I am sure that they can prove where they got all their data from and they are all very reputable sources. And the facts are the facts. But they are just dishonest as to what the data means more than what it says.
Just looking for some stats on gun violence in Australia, and knife crime in the UK that has been exploding and increasing at an alarming rate.
But as I was google-ing... and found the all scary "Brady Campaign of Stupidity". And looking on their site I found a poster with a really cool red/ white / and blue in the stars and stripes motif picture of a revolver... and it had some interesting "facts" on it.
Kinda cool, I guess. Until I actually did a little looking at the "facts" that it has on it...
And you didn't even get past the first sentence before you get the first "fact" (in the real world we call them lies). "IN 2004, GUNS MURDERED..." See this is where they are a little stupid there at the Brady campaign. In fact UNTIL I saw this poster I was under the very false assumption apparently that guns were inanimate objects. But apparently they are evil and they murder people. Stupid me. Now I am worried about other inanimate objects like the blender, the washer and dryer, and not to mention the fridge OH then there is the hammer, and oil containers in the garage and the house itself .... They will start to murder people any day now I just know it....
All joking aside. These people at the Brady camp I am sure really mean well (at least I hope so). But are just grossly misguided in their cause. What they fail to realize, or they just ignore, is that no GUN shot Mr. Brady. It was the man that used the tool that was responsible. NOT the TOOL.
Another thought was ... 2004 ? Really, 5 years behind the times. Wow they are not too quick on the draw... no pun intended.
But as I looked the "facts" up on google, I could not come up with any of their numbers. But not to be discouraged I gave them the benefit of the doubt, and just used their numbers.
So basically they use 6 countries...
New Zealand - NZ
Sweden - S
Australia - A
England/Whales - Eng
Canada - Can
U.S.A. - USA
Then they put the numbers of the sweet innocent people that "guns murdered". I mean not one single person on this list could be someone killed in self-defense. Seriously ....
In the same order (all the lists) those murdered by the gun
NZ - 5
S - 35
A - 56
Eng - 73
Can - 184
USA - 11,344
Now just by looking at these numbers you are to assume that USA is horribly violent, and murders all the time. And if they just take all the guns, it would be safe. But that is not the case if you really look hard behind the "facts" you will find the complete opposite is true.
All the numbers on how many guns are in each Country and their populations are easily attainable from Google. Simple searching really. I had all my numbers in a few minutes.
Lets look at population then actual number of firearms estimated by the governments... understanding that both are estimates.
population/ #of murdering guns.
NZ - 3,737,277 / 250,000
S - 9,000,000 / 2,000,000
A - 19,008,000 / 2,500,000 (This is after the huge, get the guns campaign)
Eng - 60,587,500 / 120,000 (This includes "deactivated" firearms)
Can - 35,000,000 / 11,000,000
USA - 305,599,518 / 200,000,000 (yes that is 2 hundred million, ask the FBI)
S - 9,000,000 / 2,000,000
A - 19,008,000 / 2,500,000 (This is after the huge, get the guns campaign)
Eng - 60,587,500 / 120,000 (This includes "deactivated" firearms)
Can - 35,000,000 / 11,000,000
USA - 305,599,518 / 200,000,000 (yes that is 2 hundred million, ask the FBI)
Using those 3 sets of numbers, you can come up with some interesting information to really put this wave of crazy gun crime into perspective. This in no way diminishes the value of any and all lives lost from any type of crime or even self-defense. Every life no matter what is precious to God, and should be to everyone else too.
The first # I would like to direct your attention to is the population % of people "murdered by guns"
NZ - .01337%
S - .03888%
A - .02946%
Eng - .01204%
Can - .05257%
USA - .37120%
S - .03888%
A - .02946%
Eng - .01204%
Can - .05257%
USA - .37120%
So again at this point it looks like it is best for the places that have less guns, right? But then you keep looking and find some interesting things.
Guns per-capita in each of these countries
NZ - .06
S - .22
A - .13
Eng - .198
Can - .31
USA - .65
S - .22
A - .13
Eng - .198
Can - .31
USA - .65
Now this is quite interesting. I have more than 5 firearms. So that means that there are at least 6 people just from myself, that do not own a firearm. My firearms range and vary. No two are alike.
Now all that is also very interesting. Now here is the nuts and bolts of the issue. The gun deaths per guns owned in each country...
NZ - .002
S - .00175
A - .00224
Eng - .06083
Can - .00167
USA - .005672
S - .00175
A - .00224
Eng - .06083
Can - .00167
USA - .005672
Now the Brady Campaign has said over and over that more regulation and less guns equal less crime. Now just from these few super basic figures you can see, that theory doesn't necessarily hold water.
What can you make your figures say about anything and statistics can look and say just about anything. The Brady Campaign does a good job of that. Pushing an agenda with a little bit of shady information. Just like any other organization with an agenda.
What the Brady Campaign won't tell you is that in their Utopian society of Great Britain, where it is almost impossible to get a firearm. There is now a huge problem with knife crime. So I will ask this question? Is this a gun issue or a moral breakdown in society? Is this really a Crime/ gun issue, or fear mongering at its worst?
The Brady camp also won't tell you that suicide, in all these places where guns are restricted, has not decreased in any way. It has stayed the same and sometimes it has risen. The only thing different is the manner in which the suicide takes place. Example, is guns are restricted so people hang themselves or gas themselves instead.
This is not a gun issue, nor a crime issue. It is fear mongering at its worse. But what is more sad is that these are just symptoms of the real issue. And the Brady camp is more interested in putting a band aid on this problem instead of getting the cause of the symptoms. Although it is much easier to remain hoplophobic (that means to be afraid of weapons, or guns) and demonize guns than it is to address the moral and social decay of a nation. And we can not expect the Brady folks to be any different than the rest of our society. Always wanting an easy way out.
Sometimes doing your best is not good enough, sometimes you have to do what is required. - W. Churchill.
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Intellectuals, do they really exist?
My grandfather had no tolerance for stupid people. He had no degree, or specialized training other than the training he received in the Army. He had an 8th grade education, yet was wiser than most of the Intellectuals today.
I guess he had it right when he would state that those that graduated from any university, that had no common sense, or those that think they are too smart for us “unwashed masses”, were nothing but College Bred Idiots.
Intellectuals are always lauded and praised by other intellectuals at the time of their “genius”. However more often than not, once the dust of time settles & the facts are clear, they end up being as sharp as bowling balls.
It is painfully obvious to most people that Intellectuals are not taken as seriously by us normal folks as they take themselves. In fact I would wager to say that, it is a good thing that the piece of paper they get when they graduate from college / university says that they are smart. Because if it didn’t no one would ever know.
What is truly amusing to me (of course as one of the unwashed masses) is that you don’t even really have to actually be an intellectual; you just have to fit in and look like one. Or if you read some old books, or speak some socialist BS you read from the idiot Marx.
What is more amusing is that they always get stuff wrong… and yet are still considered smart. Here are some examples…
Harry S. Truman – I do believe someone once said about the “country bumpkin” that he could hold his tongue in five languages. I do know he spoke and read latin and was highly intelligent. Mr Obama eat your heart out.
Calvin Coolidge – I know that he spoke and or read 4 languages like Latin, Greek, English, and Italian.
But leave it up to the intellectuals to be wrong at least 99% of the time. I mean what other field could you be wrong so often and still be praised and envied? How many times have you seen the news or read a headline that says… XXXXXX baffles experts, or xxxxxx stuns experts, or ... xxxxxxx better or worse than the experts expected etc?
What is interesting is that in the 1930’s the intellectuals said that capitalism was the problem and that we should look at the soviet union for the proper model and the way to go. But looking back we now know that up to 6 million people died in the soviet states while they were a huge exporter of food. (That is as many Russians that died as compared to the jews under Hitler.)
Oh and speaking of Hitler… Let’s not forget the intellectuals HUGE mistake in how they told us we should treat Hitler. They said Hitler was just “misunderstood” and if they could just sit down next to him and give him a hug. Then all would be well and the world would be sunshine and lollipops. I mean germany is just a small country what kind of a threat could they be? Right Obama?
Oh yeah and all the time they were saying “pay no attention to the man behind the german curtain” they were also urging both the US and the west to disarm.
I seriously hope Mr. Obama knows his history. But saying as he went to Harvard, and became a lawyer… he probably does not.
In fact there are not enough trees to cut down to make enough paper to make enough books to be filled with the things the intellectual’s were 180 degrees away from being right.
Oh yeah lets not forget the whole “the earth is flat” thing either.
It only takes one of the unwashed masses with a pinch of common sense to out do the intellectual any day of the week.
Thomas Sowell states …
“How have intellectuals managed to be so wrong, so often? By thinking that because they are knowledgeable -- or even expert -- within some narrow band out of the vast spectrum of human concerns, that makes them wise guides to the masses and to the rulers of the nation. But the ignorance of Ph.D.s is still ignorance and high-IQ groupthink is still groupthink, which is the antithesis of real thinking.”
I could not have said it better myself.
THINK ABOUT IT.
I guess he had it right when he would state that those that graduated from any university, that had no common sense, or those that think they are too smart for us “unwashed masses”, were nothing but College Bred Idiots.
Intellectuals are always lauded and praised by other intellectuals at the time of their “genius”. However more often than not, once the dust of time settles & the facts are clear, they end up being as sharp as bowling balls.
It is painfully obvious to most people that Intellectuals are not taken as seriously by us normal folks as they take themselves. In fact I would wager to say that, it is a good thing that the piece of paper they get when they graduate from college / university says that they are smart. Because if it didn’t no one would ever know.
What is truly amusing to me (of course as one of the unwashed masses) is that you don’t even really have to actually be an intellectual; you just have to fit in and look like one. Or if you read some old books, or speak some socialist BS you read from the idiot Marx.
What is more amusing is that they always get stuff wrong… and yet are still considered smart. Here are some examples…
Harry S. Truman – I do believe someone once said about the “country bumpkin” that he could hold his tongue in five languages. I do know he spoke and read latin and was highly intelligent. Mr Obama eat your heart out.
Calvin Coolidge – I know that he spoke and or read 4 languages like Latin, Greek, English, and Italian.
But leave it up to the intellectuals to be wrong at least 99% of the time. I mean what other field could you be wrong so often and still be praised and envied? How many times have you seen the news or read a headline that says… XXXXXX baffles experts, or xxxxxx stuns experts, or ... xxxxxxx better or worse than the experts expected etc?
What is interesting is that in the 1930’s the intellectuals said that capitalism was the problem and that we should look at the soviet union for the proper model and the way to go. But looking back we now know that up to 6 million people died in the soviet states while they were a huge exporter of food. (That is as many Russians that died as compared to the jews under Hitler.)
Oh and speaking of Hitler… Let’s not forget the intellectuals HUGE mistake in how they told us we should treat Hitler. They said Hitler was just “misunderstood” and if they could just sit down next to him and give him a hug. Then all would be well and the world would be sunshine and lollipops. I mean germany is just a small country what kind of a threat could they be? Right Obama?
Oh yeah and all the time they were saying “pay no attention to the man behind the german curtain” they were also urging both the US and the west to disarm.
I seriously hope Mr. Obama knows his history. But saying as he went to Harvard, and became a lawyer… he probably does not.
In fact there are not enough trees to cut down to make enough paper to make enough books to be filled with the things the intellectual’s were 180 degrees away from being right.
Oh yeah lets not forget the whole “the earth is flat” thing either.
It only takes one of the unwashed masses with a pinch of common sense to out do the intellectual any day of the week.
Thomas Sowell states …
“How have intellectuals managed to be so wrong, so often? By thinking that because they are knowledgeable -- or even expert -- within some narrow band out of the vast spectrum of human concerns, that makes them wise guides to the masses and to the rulers of the nation. But the ignorance of Ph.D.s is still ignorance and high-IQ groupthink is still groupthink, which is the antithesis of real thinking.”
I could not have said it better myself.
THINK ABOUT IT.
The Election
I am writing to say that Obama is the president elect of the USA. I do not like it. I think that it is a huge mistake, that we as Americans will have to pay for, for a generation, if not more. Not because he made history in becoming the first Black United States President, but because his voting record says that he is the most liberal senator in the senate.
However, he is now the next president. When he is sworn in, I urge all Americans to support him. I don't urge people to be taken in and duped with the "messiah" complex he has. But he will be every ones president, not just those that voted for him.
This doesn't mean however, that I will not be taking him to task on his radical ideas he wishes to impose on the nation. Some of these ideals are harmless enough ... while others could kill millions and possibly destroy the USA and cause it to stop being the nation we all love.
It is interesting however, that he supports the idea of abortion and planned parenthood. I only say that it is interesting because the lady that started it was into this insane idea of "eugenics". You know eugenics right... that was the movement to eliminate the "unwanted" from the gene pool. And at the time the movement thought that Black folks were not wanted and therefore should be eliminated. Praised by the US left of course (Margaret Sanger) started in the mostly white populated area called BROOKLYN NEW YORK. Oh did I say white? Ever notice where these "planned parenthood" places are located. "Helping" those not have babies, that should not have them?
Margaret Sanger who was white, and loved by today's US Leftists, was a racist and a murderer (in my opinnion).
But I digress...
Support and PRAY for our president. That means Bush now and Obama next year.
However, he is now the next president. When he is sworn in, I urge all Americans to support him. I don't urge people to be taken in and duped with the "messiah" complex he has. But he will be every ones president, not just those that voted for him.
This doesn't mean however, that I will not be taking him to task on his radical ideas he wishes to impose on the nation. Some of these ideals are harmless enough ... while others could kill millions and possibly destroy the USA and cause it to stop being the nation we all love.
It is interesting however, that he supports the idea of abortion and planned parenthood. I only say that it is interesting because the lady that started it was into this insane idea of "eugenics". You know eugenics right... that was the movement to eliminate the "unwanted" from the gene pool. And at the time the movement thought that Black folks were not wanted and therefore should be eliminated. Praised by the US left of course (Margaret Sanger) started in the mostly white populated area called BROOKLYN NEW YORK. Oh did I say white? Ever notice where these "planned parenthood" places are located. "Helping" those not have babies, that should not have them?
Margaret Sanger who was white, and loved by today's US Leftists, was a racist and a murderer (in my opinnion).
But I digress...
Support and PRAY for our president. That means Bush now and Obama next year.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
